A group of threat actors disrupts an oil company's online services due to disagreement with its practices. This type of threat actor is primarily motivated by what?

A group of threat actors disrupts an oil company's online services due to disagreement with its practices. This type of threat actor is primarily motivated by what?

• A. Financial gain
• B. Political/philosophical beliefs
• C. Information theft
• D. Personal vendetta

Answer: (B)

The motivation behind the actions of a group of threat actors disrupting an oil company's online services due to a disagreement with its practices is primarily rooted in political or philosophical beliefs. This scenario indicates that the attackers are driven by their stance on specific issues related to the company's operations, which often aligns with activism or ideological agendas rather than financial or personal gain. When a threat actor disrupts services to express dissent or to sway public opinion regarding environmental concerns, human rights, or similar issues, the approach is typically characterized by their desire to influence change or draw attention to their cause. This distinguishes them from other motivations, such as financial gain, which centers around monetary benefits, or personal vendetta, which is often about revenge or hostility towards an individual or organization for personal reasons. Information theft also indicates a desire to extract sensitive data for different purposes, which doesn’t apply in this context focused on direct service disruption based on belief systems. Overall, the primary driving force here is the alignment with a cause rather than tangible rewards or individual grievances.

The motivation behind the actions of a group of threat actors disrupting an oil company's online services due to a disagreement with its practices is primarily rooted in political or philosophical beliefs. This scenario indicates that the attackers are driven by their stance on specific issues related to the company's operations, which often aligns with activism or ideological agendas rather than financial or personal gain.

When a threat actor disrupts services to express dissent or to sway public opinion regarding environmental concerns, human rights, or similar issues, the approach is typically characterized by their desire to influence change or draw attention to their cause. This distinguishes them from other motivations, such as financial gain, which centers around monetary benefits, or personal vendetta, which is often about revenge or hostility towards an individual or organization for personal reasons. Information theft also indicates a desire to extract sensitive data for different purposes, which doesn’t apply in this context focused on direct service disruption based on belief systems.

Overall, the primary driving force here is the alignment with a cause rather than tangible rewards or individual grievances.